Evaluating Jobs
The questionnaires were completed by the employees and turned in to
the Committee. However, this process took longer than anticipated.
The Committee needed extra time
Due to time constraints, the Committee elected
to use the questionnaires to evaluate jobs instead of immediately
developing new job descriptions. The Committee also decided, with
management's support, that the Administration Manager, the Customer
Service Supervisor and two committee members would oversee the writing
of new job descriptions no later than one month after the conclusion
of the pay equity job evaluation process.
The STC Committee followed this process to evaluate jobs
The Committee assembled the questionnaires. Beginning
with the subfactor of Knowledge, each committee member assigned
the level they felt best fit each job class. Then together, they
discussed their results until they could reach consensus on what
the appropriate level was for each job.
The Committee worked through the 10 subfactors
until each job had a level for each subfactor. Once this was completed,
points were totalled for all the jobs.
These are the job evaluation results:
| Job Classes |
Gender |
Points |
| General Manager |
M |
865 |
| Marketing Director |
M |
762 |
| Controller |
M |
755 |
| Sales Manager |
M |
647 |
| Administration Manager |
F |
630 |
| Accounting Manager |
F |
625 |
| Accountant |
M |
592 |
| Global Markets Specialist |
F |
575 |
| Digital Markets Specialist |
F |
575 |
| Sales Representative |
M |
561 |
| Customer Service Supervisor |
F |
542 |
| Financial Analyst |
M |
540 |
| Service/Systems Technician |
M |
458 |
| Administrative Assistant |
F |
456 |
| Secretary |
F |
430 |
| Customer Service Clerk |
F |
391 |
| Accounting Clerk |
F |
330 |
| Receptionist/Typist |
F |
282 |
Comparing jobs
The job evaluations were completed, and it was now
time to compare jobs using Job-to-Job, the method of comparison
required by the Act.
|