Weighting
STC had by now designed most of the job evaluation system, by determining
subfactors and levels, and defining them. A weighting formula now
had to be applied to the system to allow the Committee to assign
value (points) to jobs.
The steps to assigning weights
The Committee (as seen on the previous pages)
determined how important each factor (skill, effort, responsibility
and working conditions) and subfactor (knowledge, interpersonal
skills/contact, problem-solving/judgement, mental effort, physical
effort, responsibility for personnel, policies and practices, as
well as for information, financial resources and material resources,
and for, environment) was to the workplace.
They developed a weighting formula that
would reflect the values of all Toronto jobs. Weights were assigned
to factors and subfactors, and point values for all levels were
calculated.
To assure gender neutrality in weighting, the
Committee again considered the goals, products and services
at the Toronto Head Office and the work done in female and male
job classes. This was helpful in determining the weight (or value)
of each of the four factors in relation to each other. Factors were
not given equal weight/value.
A basic weighting formula
The Committee used a formula based on a total
of 100% (1000 points). They divided the 100% / 1000 points between
the four factors. They alloted to:
| Skill |
35% (350 points) |
| Effort |
20% (200 points) |
| Responsibilities |
35% (350 points) |
| Working Conditions |
10% (100 points) |
Expanding the weighting formula
They expanded the basic formula by dividing the
percentage given to each factor between its subfactors. For example,
they alloted to:
EFFORT 20% (200 points)
- Mental Effort 12% (120 points)
- Physical Effort 8% (80 points)
They further broke down this formula by determining
the number of points for each level of each subfactor.
The 100% / 1000 point formula is shown on the
next page in Chart # 2. The percentage allotment between the subfactors
and through the levels is shown in Charts # 3 and 4, and the final
formula with " + " and " - " shadings is shown
in Chart # 5.
|